TREST

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Holmes v. United States, 363 F.2d 281 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …nal, through a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. So ordered. . See Harper v. United States, 122 U.S. App.D.C. 23, 350 F. 2d 1000 (1965) ; Trest v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 11, 350 F. 2d 794, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018, 86 S.Ct. 634, 15 L.Ed.2d 532 (1965). . Durham v. United States, 94 U.S.App. D.C. 228, 214 F. 2d 862, 45 A.L.R.2d 1430 (1954); see Rollerson v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 400, 343 F. 2d 269 (1964), and authorities cited therein. . In that cas…
• United States v. Thompson, 493 F.2d 305 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …juana). Since both these statutes might be applied to the same criminal conduct, the particular statute (21 U.S.C. § 176a) renders the other, general statute irrelevant. Conerly v. United States, 350 F. 2d 679, 681-682 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018, 86 S.Ct. 638, 15 L.Ed.2d 534 (1966) ; Enzor v. United States, 262 F. 2d 172, 174 (5th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 953, 79 S. Ct. 740, 3 L.Ed.2d 761 (1959). Appellant’s final argument relates to the denial of his requested entrapment instruc…
• United States v. Hughes, 626 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …quired to sustain them; if not, then the fact that both charges relate to and grow out of one transaction does not make a single offense where two are defined by statute.’ ” Conerly v. United States, 350 F. 2d 679, 681 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018, 86 S.Ct. 638, 15 L.Ed.2d 534 (1966) (quoting Thomas v. United States, 249 F. 2d 429, 431 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 936, 78 S.Ct. 421, 2 L.Ed.2d 418 (1957)). Applying this test, we find that the elements of the two offenses are sufficientl…