HAFIZ

v.

MAXWELL, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Holmes v. United States, 363 F.2d 281 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …nal, through a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. So ordered. . See Harper v. United States, 122 U.S. App.D.C. 23, 350 F. 2d 1000 (1965) ; Trest v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 11, 350 F. 2d 794, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018, 86 S.Ct. 634, 15 L.Ed.2d 532 (1965). . Durham v. United States, 94 U.S.App. D.C. 228, 214 F. 2d 862, 45 A.L.R.2d 1430 (1954); see Rollerson v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 400, 343 F. 2d 269 (1964), and authorities cited therein. . In that cas…
• United States v. Hughes, 626 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …quired to sustain them; if not, then the fact that both charges relate to and grow out of one transaction does not make a single offense where two are defined by statute.’ ” Conerly v. United States, 350 F. 2d 679, 681 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018, 86 S.Ct. 638, 15 L.Ed.2d 534 (1966) (quoting Thomas v. United States, 249 F. 2d 429, 431 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 936, 78 S.Ct. 421, 2 L.Ed.2d 418 (1957)). Applying this test, we find that the elements of the two offenses are sufficientl…
• United States v. Robertson, 507 F.2d 1148 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …raise the defense. E. g., United States v. Simms, 150 U.S.App. D.C. 182, 463 F. 2d 1273 (1972) ; United States v. Bradley, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 405, 463 F. 2d 808 (1972) ; Trest v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 11, 350 F. 2d 794 (1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1018, 86 S.Ct. 634, 15 L.Ed. 2d 532 (1966). But see United States v. Bradley, 149 U.S.App.D.C. 405, 409, 463 F. 2d 808, 812 (1972) (Fahy, J., dissenting). . Whalem v. United States, supra, 346 F. 2d at 819 n. 10. . 128 U.S.App.D.C. 416, 417, 389 F. 2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →