DERFUS
v.
CALIFORNIA; CUDIA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; WILSON V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; BATTAGLIA V. UNITED STATES; ANDREWS V. UNITED STATES; POSTELL ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; ANDREWS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; OWENS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; HILL V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; SYVERSON V. UNITED STATES
DERFUS
CALIFORNIA; CUDIA ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; WILSON V. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; BATTAGLIA V. UNITED STATES; ANDREWS V. UNITED STATES; POSTELL ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; ANDREWS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; OWENS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; HILL V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; SYVERSON V. UNITED STATES
382 U.S. 1021
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Amsler v. United States, 381 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1967)…12 L.Ed. 2d 498, rehearing den. 377 U.S. 1010, 84 S.Ct. 1902, 12 L.Ed.2d 1058; Lindsey v. United States, 9 Cir., 332 F. 2d 688; Battaglia v. United States, 9 Cir., 349 F. 2d 556, cert. den. 382 U.S. 955, 86 S.Ct. 430, 15 L.Ed.2d 360, rehearing den. 382 U.S. 1021, 86 S.Ct. 613, 15 L.Ed.2d 537. Therefore, the court did not err in admitting the tape recordings of the telephone conversations in question. In another assignment of error it is claimed on behalf of Amsler that the court erred in denying a motion t…
-
Weaver v. Ward Lane, 382 F.2d 251 (7th Cir. 1967)…she could give consent to a search of a room in her [*255] home. United States v. Sferas, 7 Cir., 1954, 210 F. 2d 69, 74-75; United States v. Cudia, 7 Cir., 1965, 346 F. 2d 227, 229, cert. den. 382 U.S. 955, 86 S.Ct. 428, 15 L.Ed.2d 539, rehrg. den. 382 U.S. 1021, 86 S.Ct. 612, 15 L.Ed.2d 536. We conclude that the order granting the Writ of Habeas Corpus releasing the petitioner from custody must be reversed and the cause remanded for denial of the petition for Habeas Corpus. Mr. Thomas L. Shaffer of the I…
-
United States v. Rubino, 431 F.2d 284 (6th Cir. 1970)…victions, holding that there was not a sufficient showing of prejudice to justify reversal. To like effect see United States v. Andrews, 347 F. 2d 207, 211 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 956, 86 S.Ct. 431, 436, 15 L.Ed.2d 360, rehearing denied, 382 U.S. 1021, 86 S.Ct. 613, 15 L.Ed.2d 537. In summary, the District Judge, after interrogating each juror separately, did not find the “slightest reason” to believe that the newspaper articles could influence the verdict in any manner. We conclude that the Dis…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence