HEMPHILL ET UX., DBA CAPITOL SKATELAND
v.
WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION
HEMPHILL ET UX., DBA CAPITOL SKATELAND
WASHINGTON STATE TAX COMMISSION
383 U.S. 103
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Mallick v. Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 749 F.2d 771 (D.C. Cir. 1984)…n, based on analogous right of shareholders). Among the cases on which Morley relied was Deacon v. International Union of Operating Eng’rs, Local No. 12, 236 Cal.App.2d 302, 46 Cal.Rptr. 11 (Cal.Dist.Ct.App.1965), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 383 U.S. 103, 86 S.Ct. 717, 15 L.Ed.2d 616 (1966). See Morley, 378 F. 2d at 744 (citing Deacon). Deacon held that an earlier California case declaring that union members had a common-law right to examine the books of their union for proper cause, Mooney v. Barte…
-
Grace Line, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 243 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1957)…years, it is evident that Congress did not intend tolls to be determined upon so tenuous and [*853] temporary a- basis.” Defendant-Appel-lee’s Brief, p. 42. . Id. p. 43. . See note 24 supra, . Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 383 U.S. 103, 111—112, 68 S.Ct. 431, 92 L.Ed. 568. Unlike the present law, the statute before the Supreme Court provided that CAB decisions “shall be submitted to the President before publication thereof.” 49 U.S.C. § 601. . At the time the present statute was…