NOLAN
v.
RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
NOLAN
RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
383 U.S. 104
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Citizens TO Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 432 F.2d 1307 (6th Cir. 1970)…rity afforded the acts of an administrator. See Goldberg v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299, 293 F. 2d 807, 812 (6th Cir.), cert. denied 368 U.S. 938, 82 S.Ct. 379, 7 L.Ed.2d 337 (1961); Nolan v. Rhodes, 251 F.Supp. 584, 587 (S.D.Ohio 1965), aff’d 383 U.S. 104, 86 S.Ct. 716, 15 L.Ed.2d 616 (1966). The presumption of regularity is a particularly strong one. See, e. g., Braniff Airways, Inc. v. C. A. B., 126 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 379 F. 2d 453, 460 (1967). This, of course, does not relieve the party moving for…
-
Krakoff v. United States, 431 F.2d 847 (6th Cir. 1970)…e Meredith v. City of Winter Haven, 320 U.S. 228, 64 S.Ct. 7, 88 L.Ed. 9 (1943). In this Circuit, abstention has been recognized in a case involving construction of the Constitution of a state. Nolan v. Rhodes, 251 F.Supp. 584 (S.D.Ohio 1965), aff’d 383 U.S. 104, 86 S.Ct. 716, 15 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965). Abstention is not ordinarily granted in cases involving only common law questions which a federal court, under its diversity jurisdiction, is bound [*849] to decide. Meredith v. City of Winter Haven, supra. In…