WOOD

v.

BOLES, WARDEN; HOCHBERG V. CALIFORNIA; IN RE DAUP; WHITE V. DIRECTOR, VETERANS ADMINISTRATION HOSPITAL; LYNCH V. UNITED STATES; LONG V. BOLES, WARDEN; CERVANTES V. UNITED STATES; AND GREATHOUSE V. BOLES, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Schack v. State, 201 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
  …iction in the Supreme Court of the United States during the October term 1965. Schack v. Florida, 1965, 382 U.S. 804, 86 S.Ct. 148, 15 L.Ed.2d 112; Schack v. Florida, 1966, 382 U.S. 1016, 86 S.Ct. 629, 15 L.Ed.2d 530; Schack v. Simpson, Judge, 1966, 383 U.S. 904, 86 S.Ct. 916, 15 L.Ed.2d 678; Schack v. Roberts, Clerk, 1966, 383 U.S. 904, 86 S.Ct. 921, 15 L.Ed.2d 678; Schack v. Florida, 1966, 383 U.S. 964, 86 S.Ct. 1283, 16 L.Ed.2d 312; Schack v. Bogart, Clerk, 1966, 384 U.S. 984, 86 S.Ct. 1892, 16 L.Ed. 2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Fabrizio, 385 U.S. 263 (U.S. 1966)
  …not come within the purpose of Section 1953 ... as disclosed in the legislative history of the Act.” The Government brought the case directly here under the provisions of the Criminal Appeals Act, 18 U. S. C. § 3731. We noted probable jurisdiction, 383 U. S. 904. Our function under that Act is limited to the construction of the statute and “this Court is not at liberty to go beyond the question of the correctness of that construction and consider other objections to the indictment. The Government’s appeal d…