CAMPBELL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (158 total)

• Estelle v. Williams, 425 U.S. 501 (U.S. 1976)
  …courts, including the Supreme Court, have declined to notice [alleged] errors not objected to below even though such errors involve a criminal defendant’s constitutional rights.” United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F. 2d 276, 280 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U. S. 907 (1966). The reason for this rule is clear: if the defendant has an objection, there is an obligation to call the matter to the court's attention so the trial judge will have an opportunity to remedy the situation. Significantly, in the Henderson c…
• United States v. Demetrios Papadakis and Joseph Novoa, 510 F.2d 287 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …pose for which the evidence had been received. Failure to raise these issues in the court below precludes review here. United States v. Bozza, supra, 365 F. 2d at 214; United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F. 2d 276 (2 Cir. 1965) (en banc), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907, 86 S.Ct. 887, 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966). In any event, on our analysis, the evidence was itself probative of the conspiracy charged in the indictment. II Appellant Novoa’s second basic argument for reversal is that conspiracy counts one and four were…
• United States v. Silverman, 430 F.2d 106 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …having found, in the context of the whole case, that the failure to give more explicit instructions is not plain error within Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b), we find no reversible error. United States v. Indiviglio, 352 F. 2d 276 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 907, 86 S.Ct. 887, 15 L.Ed.2d 663 (1966). Cross-Examination of Character Witnesses Silverman presented seven character witnesses. Before cross-examination was begun, the government put defense counsel on notice that questions would be asked concerning…