ENGBERG

v.

KANSAS

Citator

Cited By

• Nelson v. Miller, 373 F.2d 474 (3d Cir. 1967)
  …related SECNAVINST § 1900.9(4) (c) as stating that intoxication does not constitute an excuse for homosexual involvement. The instruction in fact uses the phrase “homosexual eon-duet.” (Italics supplied.) . 249 F.Supp. 943 (E.D.Pa.1966), cert. den. 383 U.S. 921, 86 S.Ct. 923, 15 L.Ed.2d 676 (1966). . Id. at 945. . Schwartz v. Covington, 341 F. 2d 537, 538 (9 Cir. 1965) (“merits of * * * appeal to the District Court.”); Cf. Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. Fed’l Power Com’n, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 106, 259 F…
• Bard v. Seamans, 507 F.2d 765 (10th Cir. 1974)
  …r, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 357, 379 F. 2d 134; Nelson v. Miller, 373 F. 2d 474 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2042, 18 L.Ed.2d 980; Unglesby v. Zimny, 250 F.Supp. 714 (N.D.Cal.); Crawford v. Davis, 249 F.Supp. 943 (E.D. Pa.), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 921, 86 S.Ct. 923, 15 L.Ed.2d 676; Covington v. Schwartz, 230 F.Supp. 249 (N.D.Cal.), modified, 341 F. 2d 537 (9th Cir.). . Speaking with reference only to the APA and the Declaratory Judgment Act, the Court stated that: “[o]n their face the provisions…
• Daegele v. Crouse, 429 F.2d 503 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …; Naugle v. State of Oklahoma, 375 F. 2d 424 (10th Cir. 1967), and; 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b). In an initial memorandum opposing summary affirmance, Daegele urges, inter alia, that under State v. Engberg, 194 Kan. 520, 400 P. 2d 701 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 921, 86 S. Ct. 899, 15 L.Ed.2d 676, he may not raise the validity of the 1957 Missouri conviction in any Kansas post-conviction proceeding, and that his state remedies are accordingly ineffective. As he recognizes in a second memorandum opposing affirma…