HOLMES ET AL.

v.

EDDY ET AL.; NEHRING V. GERRITY; EASTER V. ZIFF ET AL.; SCALZA V. UNITED STATES; JONES, ADMINISTRATOR V. UNITED STATES; STELLO V. PENNSYLVANIA; GILLENTINE V. UNITED STATES; HERR ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; TRANTINO V. NEW JERSEY; BOWDEN V. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.; VIDA V. ROTH, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE; SKOLNICK V. HALLETT ET AL.; ESKRIDGE V. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT; FURTAK V. NEW YORK; MCGANN V. RICHARDSON, WARDEN, ET AL.; MCINTOSH V. UNITED STATES; ZANCA V. MAIMONIDES HOSPITAL

Citator

Cited By

• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc., 497 F.2d 473 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …guidelines on recruiting prospects and consummating a sale. See SEC v. Glen W. Turner Enterprises, Inc., supra at 482; United States v. Herr, 338 F. 2d 607 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 999, 86 S.Ct. 563, 15 L.Ed.2d 487, rehearing denied, 383 U.S. 922, 86 S.Ct. 898, 15 L.Ed.2d 679 (1966); cf. Marshall v. Lamson Bros, and Co., 368 F.Supp. 486, 488 (S.D.Iowa 1974); Mitzner v. Cardet International, Inc. et al., 358 F.Supp. 1262, 1265 (N.D.Ill.1973).8 B. The Third Element — Solely from the Efforts o…
• McINTOSH v. United States, 362 F.2d 636 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …ntosh also sought relief from the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit with respect to the Ohio court’s 1964 orders. This was unsuccessful. Certiorari was denied, 382 U.S. 1029, 86 S.Ct. 652, 15 L.Ed.2d 542, and rehearing was denied, 383 U.S. 922, 86 S.Ct. 906, 15 L.Ed.2d 680. The gist of the present proceeding, as we read McIntosh’s papers, is that, despite the Ohio court’s orders for the vacation of its sentence on the Iowa charge, a formal Ohio judgment to that effect was never entered;…