UNITED BISCUIT CO. OF AMERICA

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Burl A. Sawyers, 423 F.2d 1335 (4th Cir. 1970)
  …also the majority’s duty to listen to the minority, United States v. Pope, 415 F. 2d 685 (8th Cir. 1969); United States v. Smith, 353 F. 2d 166 (4th Cir. 1965); Mangan v. Broderick and Bascom Rope Company, 351 F. 2d 24 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 926, 86 S.Ct. 930, 15 L.Ed.2d 846 (1966); Green v. United States, 309 F. 2d 852 (5th Cir. 1962); United States v. Rogers, 289 F. 2d 433 (4th Cir. 1961); or charged that the jury had to agree, Jenkins v. United States, 380 U.S. 445, 85 S.Ct. 1059, 13 L.E…
• ST. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 605 F.2d 1169 (10th Cir. 1979)
  …ined by FDIC on the note which Soldiers gave to the bank. The state court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter. Its judgment is not subject to collateral attack. Brennan v. Grover, [158] Colo. [66], 404 P. 2d 544, 546, cert. denied 383 U.S. 926, [86 S.Ct. 929, 15 L.Ed.2d 845] neither is the sheriff’s deed. See Riepen v. Robinson, [150] Colo. [222], 372 P. 2d 456, 460. [Emphasis supplied.] [R., Vol. I, pp. 60-61]. Temple’s complaint in the instant case acknowledges that its only claim of…
• Torncello v. The United States, 681 F.2d 756 (Ct. Cl. 1982)
  …contracts. In a similar situation the Court of Claims found it unnecessary to resolve the question of whether or not the contract was a requirements contract. Charles R. Nesbitt v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 666 [345 F. 2d 583] (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 926 [86 S.Ct. 931, 15 L.Ed.2d 846] (1966). In order to reach our decision, we assume, without finding, that the representations made by the appellant with regard to its interpretation of the bidding provisions and the subsequent contract were correct.…

  ← 1 / 3 →