JETT

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• United States v. Boyle, 469 U.S. 241 (U.S. 1985)
  …ts have indicated that “reasonable cause” is a question of fact, to be determined only from the particular situation presented in each particular case. See, e. g., Estate of Mayer v. Commissioner, 351 F. 2d 617 (CA2 1965) (per curiam), cert. denied, 383 U. S. 935 (1966); Coates v. Commissioner, 234 F. 2d 459, 462 (CA8 1956). This view is not entirely correct. Whether the elements that constitute “reasonable cause” are present in a given situation is a question of fact, but what elements must be present to…
• United States v. Harris, 458 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …case or to listen to any media discussion of it. In so contending, appellants rely heavily on two Seventh Circuit cases, United States v. D’Antonio, 7 Cir. 1965, 342 F. 2d 667, and United States v. Panczko, 7 Cir. 1965, 353 F. 2d 676, cert. denied, 383 U.S. 935, 86 S.Ct. 1066, 15 L.Ed.2d 853. We note that D’Antonio and Panczko appear to impose more stringent restrictions on the discretion of a trial judge to decline to sequester the jury than does this court. See Tyler v. United States, 5 Cir. 1968, 397 F.…
• Timely Prods. Corp. v. Arron, 523 F.2d 288 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …may not pass upon the validity of claims which were not put in issue, either by a claim of infringement or by a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity. Felburn v. New York Central Railroad Co., 350 F. 2d 416, 420 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 935, 86 S.Ct. 1063, 15 L.Ed.2d 852 (1966). Validity and Enforceability of the Arron ’264 Patent The patented invention The four claims of the Arron ’264 patent, which are set forth in full in the margin,2 cover an alleged improvement on the Costanzo…