OVERBY

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Dickinson, 465 F.2d 496 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …, 178 So. 2d 857; Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co., 10 Cir., 1965, 348 F. 2d 643, cert. denied, 1966, 385 U.S. 949, 87 S.Ct. 323, 17 L.Ed.2d 227; Koehring Co. v. Hyde Construction Co., 1966, 382 U.S. 362, 86 S.Ct. 522, 15 L.Ed.2d 416, reh. den. 383 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 1062, 15 L.Ed.2d 857; Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co., 10 Cir., 1968, 388 F. 2d 501, cert. denied, 391 U.S. 905, 88 S.Ct. 1654, 20 L.Ed.2d 419; Dunn v. United States, 10 Cir., 1968, 388 F. 2d 511; Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co…
• A. Olinick & Sons v. Dempster Bros., Inc., 365 F.2d 439 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …). However, the Court has shown itself willing to spell out in considerable detail the importance of the relevant factors, see Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 643-646, 84 S.Ct. 805, 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964); and in Koehring Co. v. Hyde Constr. Co., 383 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 1062, 15 L.Ed.2d 857 (1966), the Court held that under extraordinary circumstances an appellate court, convinced that the trial court erred in failing to transfer a case, could transfer the case itself.…
• Hyde Constr. Co., Inc. v. Koehring Co., 388 F.2d 501 (10th Cir. 1968)
  …nited States Supreme Court on January 17, 1966, which held that the Oklahoma federal court had jurisdiction under the instanter transfer. See Koehring Company v. Hyde Construction Company, 382 U.S. 362, 86 S.Ct. 522, 15 L.Ed.2d 416, rehearing denied 383 U.S. 939, 86 S.Ct. 1062, 15 L.Ed.2d 857. On October 4,1965, the'Supreme Court of Mississippi denied the appeal of Koeh-ring, held that the Chancery Court had jurisdiction, and reduced the judgment by about $50,000. See Koehring Company v. Hyde Construction…

  ← 1 / 2 →