TREMONT, AKA LARRO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Pacheco, 489 F.2d 554 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …astain, 7 Cir., 1970, 435 F. 2d 686, 687; United States v. Wainwright, 10 Cir., 1969, 413 F. 2d 796, 802-803, cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1009, 90 S.Ct. 566, 24 L.Ed.2d 501 (1970); United States v. Tremont, 6 Cir., 1965, 351 F. 2d 144, 146, cert. denied, 383 U.S. 944, 86 S.Ct. 1198, 16 L.Ed.2d 207 (1966); McCroskey v. United States, 8 Cir., 1965, 339 F. 2d 895, 897. After a thorough review of the record, moreover, it is clear to us that appellants’ other assorted contentions are groundless. We have examined all…
• Anderson v. United States, 369 F.2d 11 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …is clear that Judge Nordbye’s remark did not constitute prejudice, much less “plain error” recognizable under Rule 52(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. See, Wilson v. United States, 8 Cir., 1965, 352 F. 2d 889, 892, cert. denied, 383 U.S. 944, 86 S.Ct. 1199, 16 L.Ed.2d 207. VI. Denial of motion for new trial. Appellant’s motion for new trial was made upon the ground of newly discovered evidence; to-wit, (1) two envelopes addressed to National at a secretarial service which had been deli…
• United States v. Penick, 496 F.2d 1105 (7th Cir. 1974)
  …oper foundation for the proffered testimony and finally that “[i]n any event, it is clearly within the discretion of the trial judge to exclude such evidence,” citing, e. g., United States v. Tremont, 6 Cir., 351 F. 2d 144, 146 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 944, 86 S.Ct. 1198, 16 L.Ed.2d 207 (1966). Indeed, Tremont, together with a number of other cases hereinafter referred to, is authority for the proposition that federal courts have consistently denied admission in evidence of the results of a lie detec…