FRIED

v.

BROOKLYN BAR ASSOCIATION

Citator

Cited By

• Havoco OF Am., Ltd. v. Shell OIL Co., 626 F.2d 549 (7th Cir. 1980)
  …xtreme methods of unfair competition, as a per se violation of the Act. A Pick-Barth type cause of action was also recognized by the Tenth Circuit in Perryton Wholesale, Inc. v. Pioneer Distributing Co., 353 F. 2d 618 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 945, 86 S.Ct. 1202, 16 L.Ed.2d 208 (1966), although that opinion did not employ per se terminology. To our awareness, only one other case, C. Albert Sauter Co. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., 368 F.Supp. 501 (E.D.Pa.1973), has expressly applied a per se analy…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adam & EVE Cosmetics, Inc., 567 F.2d 723 (7th Cir. 1977)
  …fact, the Board’s determination regarding the supervisory status of an employee will not be overturned as long as substantial evidence exists to support the Board’s finding. NLRB v. Ertel Mfg. Corp., 352 F. 2d 916, 918 (7th Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 383 U.S. 945, 86 S.Ct. 1202, 16 L.Ed.2d 208 (1966). In applying the “substantial evidence” test, however, we are not empowered to rubber-stamp the Board’s decision simply because the supporting evidence may be “substantial” when considered by itself and in isol…
• Fujiwara v. Clark, 703 F.2d 357 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …njunctive claim finally determined all issues common to it and the claim for dam [*359] ages. 477 F.Supp. at 829 & n. 16. See Perryton Wholesale, Inc. v. Pioneer Distributing Company of Kansas, Inc., 353 F. 2d 618, 623 (10th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 945, 86 S.Ct. 1202, 16 L.Ed.2d 208 (1966).2 II Following the grant of permanent injunction, Appellees moved the District Court for a summary judgment on the issue of damages, contending that they were entitled to qualified or good-faith immunity from…