CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO.

v.

LUDWIG, GUARDIAN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Nesbitt v. Cmty. Health OF S. Dade, Inc., 467 So. 2d 711 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …This rule applies with equal force in medical malpractice cases.6 See Walski v. Tiesenga, 72 Ill.2d 249, 21 Ill.Dec. 201, 381 N.E. 2d 279 (1978); Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, 33 Ill.2d 326, 211 N.E. 2d 253 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 1204, 16 L.Ed.2d 209 (1966); Block v. Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center, 93 Ill.App.3d 578, 49 Ill.Dec. 34, 417 N.E. 2d 724 (1981); Hirn v. Edgewater Hospital, 86 Ill.App.3d 939, 42 Ill.Dec. 261, 408 N.E. 2d 970 (1980); Rytko- [*71…
• Brown v. M. David Sims, M.D., 538 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
  …the issue of standards for anesthesia care); Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hosp., 33 Ill.2d 326, 211 N.E. 2d 253 (1965) (evidence of standard regulations for hospitals is relevant on question of due care but not conclusive), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 1204, 16 L.Ed.2d 209 (1966). The medical record services section of the manual is organized into a brief statement of principle followed by concise statements of standards. After each “Standard” statement is an explicative “Interpretation…
• Insinga v. LaBELLA, 543 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 1989)
  …sonably should have known that LaBella was an imposter and incompetent to provide medical services in its facility. Insinga relies principally on Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, 33 Ill.2d 326, 211 N.E. 2d 253 (1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 1204, 16 L.Ed.2d 209 (1966), and Pedroza v. Bryant, 101 Wash.2d 226, 677 P. 2d 166 (1984), which adopted the so-called “corporate negligence doctrine” for hospitals. Insinga also asserts that the legislature’s subsequent enactment of secti…

  ← 1 / 2 →