AMERICAN GUILD OF VARIETY ARTISTS
v.
SMITH, DBA SMITH ENTERTAINMENT AGENCY ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-04-18
No. 808
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
384 U.S. 30 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further proceedings in light of United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U. S. 715.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Smith v. Am. Guild OF Variety Artists, 368 F.2d 511 (8th Cir. 1966)
    …the jury verdict against American Guild of Variety Artists (AGVA) upon the cause of action based on wrongful interference with contract rights. Rehearing was denied September 9, 1965. On April 18, 1966, in American Guild of Variety Artists v. Smith, 384 U.S. 30, 86 S.Ct. 1283, 16 L.Ed.2d 332, the Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated our decision and remanded in an opinion reading: “The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is vacated and the case is remand…
  • Harber v. The Ohio Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 512 F.2d 170 (8th Cir. 1975)
    …e instant case. . Producing Agent’s Contract clause XIII B, note 5, supra. . See generally Restatement of Torts § 766 (1939); Smith v. American Guild of Variety Artists, 349 F. 2d 975, 980-81 (8th Cir. 1965), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 384 U.S. 30, 86 S.Ct. 1283, 16 L.Ed.2d 332 (1966) (Minn. law). . See also American Surety Co. v. Schottenbauer, 257 F. 2d 6, 11-12 (8th Cir. 1958); Restatement of Torts § 767 (1939); 1 F. Harper & F. James, Jr., The Law of Torts § 6.12 (1956); W. Prosser, The…
  • …ent to approach the sufficiency of the evidence aspect of the present appeal through the Moore Dry Dock standards, just as we were in Smith v. American Guild of Variety Artists, 349 F. 2d 975, 979 (8 Cir. 1965), vacated and remanded on other grounds 384 U.S. 30, 86 S.Ct. 1283, 16 L.Ed.2d 332, reaffirmed 368 F. 2d 511 (8 Cir. 1966), cert. denied 387 U.S. 931, 87 S.Ct. 2052, 18 L.Ed.2d 991. No point is made as to the satisfaction here of the first, second and fourth of the four Moore standards. The picketin…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw