POPE
v.
DAGGETT ET AL.
POPE
DAGGETT ET AL.
384 U.S. 33
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Upon consideration of the representations of the Solicitor General that the relief petitioner seeks is presently available due to changes in the applicable prison regulations and upon an examination of all of the papers submitted, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas with instructions to dismiss as moot.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cardarella v. United States, 375 F.2d 222 (8th Cir. 1967)…he article is factual and neither inflammatory nor inherently prejudicial. The jury was not exposed to information not already known to them. Cf. Marshall v. United States, 360 U.S. 310, 79 S.Ct. 1171, 3 L.Ed.2d 1250 (1959), and Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 33, 86 S.Ct. 1507, 16 L.Ed.2d 600 (1966).…