MELBOURNE AIRWAYS & AIR COLLEGE INC., AND NATIONAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS, PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
BEATRICE THOMPSON AND THE FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS, CROSS-PETITIONER
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the fact and time of death, as well as whether an injury occurred in the course of employment, can be proven by circumstantial evidence.
An employee piloting a charter flight disappeared with his aircraft. The widow filed a claim for death benefits, alleging a specific date of death. Th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Workers' Compensation Death Benefits cases and more on FLexlaw
By petition and cross-petition for writ ■of certiorari the parties controvert an order •of the deputy, affirmed by the commission, which awarded compensation to the minor •children of the employee but found the ■claim of his widow to be barred by the statute of limitations.1
Robert L. Thompson was employed by •the petitioner to pilot aircraft on charter ■or air-taxi trips. On December 14, 1961, lie departed on a charter trip scheduled to include a flight to Nassau, Bahamas. He ■did not return and, according to testimony in the record, no trace has since been found ■of either plane or pilot. The respondent Beatrice Thompson filed claim in April 1964 for death benefits for herself and the three minor children of the parties, alleging ■a date of accident of December 16, 1961.
The deputy found that the employee:
“ * * * suffered an accident and injury resulting in his death. In making this finding I rely on the testimony of the manager of the employer to the effect that he, in his capacity as manager for the employer, initiated a search for the aircraft when neither the pilot nor the aircraft appeared as scheduled. The undersigned further considered that an intensive search was made for both pilot and aircraft and no evidence of either was found and that on November 12, 1963, a determination was made by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States, that Robert L. Thompson, had met his death on December 16, 1961, in a plane crash at sea. Further, in making this finding the undersigned relies on the testimony of J. David Finger that he has not seen the aircraft or the pilot since the departure on December 14, 1961, and on the testimony of the widow, Beatrice Thompson, that she has not seen the claimant alive since his departure on said ill fated flight.”
We conclude that the claim was properly determined on the theory that in a case of this nature both the fact of death and time of death are to be proved as other material facts and may be established by circumstantial evidence. The proof on this issue in compensation claims as in our civil cases generally is sufficient “ * * * if the circumstantial evidence amounts to a preponderance of all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the circumstances in evidence to the end that the evidence is not reasonably susceptible of two equally reasonable inferences.” 2 In the absence of any record evidence that the employee deviated from his employer’s mission, the charter flight, prior to the cessation of contact in this case, we think the facts require a finding that the disappearance occurred December 16, 1961 in the course of employment, and sustain the further finding of death on that date as *307the most reasonable inference in the circumstances.3
Petitioner’s additional objections are to the use of claimant’s deposition permitted by the deputy in lieu of personal appearance at the hearing, and to the admissibility of documentary evidence of the federal administrative determination of death. The evidence absent this document is sufficient to support the deputy’s conclusion. Moreover, we find no showing of abuse of the deputy’s discretion in respect to these issues.4
The cross-petition, asserting error in the application of the statute of limitations prior to the “official” finding and notice of death for social security purposes, must be denied upon the same reasoning and authorities by which we resolve the primary evidentiary issue above — the propriety of the determination of the fact and time of death as other factual issues. Certainly no presumption can be conclusive in this situation, and we think the disposition of this issue was entirely proper upon the recited facts.
The petition and cross-petition are denied.
The petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees is hereby granted in the amount of $350.00.
THORNAL, C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and SEBRING (Retired), JTJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Firemen's Fund Am. Life Ins. Co. v. Wohl, 334 So. 2d 261 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…from accidental means, may be proved by circumstantial evidence, and it is sufficient if there is a preponderance of the evidence, whether direct or circumstantial, on such an issue. See Melbourne Airways & Air College, Inc. v. Thompson, Fla. 1966, 190 So. 2d 305, in which the rule is stated: ** “We conclude that the claim was properly determined on the theory that in a case of this nature both the fact of death and time of death are to be proved as other material facts and may be established by circumstan…
-
Tierra Verde City, Inc. v. Berlanti, 196 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1966)…d, relative to sufficiency of the order and propriety of fees awarded, have been determined in respondent’s favor. The petition is therefore denied. THORNAL, C. J., ERVIN, J., and WAYBRIGHT, Circuit Judge, concur. CALDWELL, J., dissents. . Fla., 190 So. 2d 305, opinion filed July 27, 1966.…
-
Am. AIR Taxi, Inc. v. Lectra Shore, 196 So. 2d 417 (Fla. 1967)…subd. e, 31 F.S.A. Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. See Melbourne Airways & Air College, Inc. et al. v. Thompson et al., Fla.1966, 190 So. 2d 305, and authorities cited. ■The petition is therefore denied. The attorney for the respondent Lectra Shore, widow, is hereby awarded a fee in the amount of $250.00 for services in this Court. It is so ordered. THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CONNELL, C…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Johns v. Burns, 67 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 1953)
- Weber v. Berry, 133 So. 2d 327 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- King v. Keller, 141 So. 2d 259 (Fla. 1962)