VENABLE
v.
TEXAS

U.S. | 1966-05-23
No. 1196
384 U.S. 266 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Sweet v. S.C. Dep't OF Corr., 529 F.2d 854 (4th Cir. 1975)
    …thdrawal or limitation of many privileges and rights, a retraction justified by the considerations underlying our penal system,’ ” Pell v. Procunier (1974) 417 U.S. 817, 822, 94 S.Ct. 2800, 2804, 41 L.Ed.2d 495 (quoting from Price v. Johnston (1948) 384 U.S. 266, 285, 68 S.Ct. 1049, 92 L.Ed. 1356), and that “[Fjederal courts sit not to supervise prisons but to enforce the constitutional rights of all ‘persons,’ including prisoners.” Cruz v. Beto (1972) 405 U.S. 319, 321, 92 S.Ct. 1079, 1081, 31 L.Ed.2d 263.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw