LAMBRIGHT
v.
CALIFORNIA
LAMBRIGHT
CALIFORNIA
384 U.S. 434
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Simeon Mgmt. Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 579 F.2d 1137 (9th Cir. 1978)…v. California, 297 U.S. 175, 183-4, 56 S.Ct. 421, 80 L.Ed. 567 (1936). That scheme does not imper-missibly intrude upon state regulation. Cf. Double-Eagle Lubricants, Inc. v. State of Texas, 248 F.Supp. 515, 517-18 (N.D.Tex. 1965), appeal dismissed, 384 U.S. 434, 86 S.Ct. 1601, 16 L.Ed.2d 670 (1966). 4) Petitioners contend that the FTC has no jurisdiction to encroach upon the confidential relationship between a physician and patient. They argue that, because HCG is administered by or under the supervision…
-
Rogers v. RAY Gardner Flying Serv., Inc., 435 F.2d 1389 (5th Cir. 1970)…this instance Congress has clearly indicated any such intent to supersede state laws of bailments as related to the operation of aircraft.7 See Double-Eagle Lubricants, Incorporated v. State of Texas, N.D.Tex.1965, 248 F.Supp. 515, appeal dismissed 384 U.S. 434, 86 S.Ct. 1601, 16 L.Ed.2d 670, and the cases cited therein. If Congress had any such intent toward pre-emption in this area it was fully capable of making that intent clear directly and not by indirection requiring the circuitous reasoning plaintif…