CAVANAUGH
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1966-06-20
No. 747
384 U.S. 882 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Gladstone, 450 F.2d 913 (5th Cir. 1971)
    …t this immunity relates back to his earlier conviction. Gladstone relies on the case of Frank v. United States, 120 U.S.App.D. C. 392, 1965, 347 F. 2d 486, cert. dis. 382 U.S. 923, 86 S.Ct. 317, 15 L.Ed.2d 338, vacated and remanded on other grounds, 384 U.S. 882, 86 S.Ct. 1912, 16 L.Ed.2d 994 which held that where testimony, concerning a particular transaction is compelled under a grant of immunity, that immunity is retrospective as well as prospective and requires that even convictions obtained prior to th…
  • United States v. Honorable Sarah T. Hughes, 388 F.2d 236 (5th Cir. 1968)
    …d appendix p. 29] . Dennis v. United States, 1966, 384 U.S. 855, 86 S.Ct. 1840, 16 L.Ed.2d 973. This was followed by four per curiam decisions vacating judgments and remanding for reconsideration in the light of Dennis, Leon v. United States, 1966, 384 U.S. 882, 86 S.Ct. 1912, 16 L.Ed.2d 994; National Dairy Products Corp. v. United States, 1966, 384 U.S. 883, 86 S.Ct. 1913, 16 L.Ed.2d 995; Lucignano v. United States, 1966, 384 U.S. 884, 86 S.Ct. 1917, 16 L.Ed.2d 997; Worthy v. United States, 1966, 384 U.S.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw