ENGLAND ET AL.

v.

LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Romero-Galue, 757 F.2d 1147 (11th Cir. 1985)
  …xtraterritorial] criminal jurisdiction by a nation under five general principles. They are the territorial, national, protective, universality and passive personality principles." Rivard v. United States, 375 F. 2d 882, 885 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 885, 88 S.Ct. 151, 19 L.Ed.2d 181 (1967). . Congress grounded section 955a(c) in the protective principle of international law. In passing the provision, Congress observed that the United States may, consistent with the protective principle, assert jur…
• Heaney v. Allen, 425 F.2d 869 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …in the subsequent rejection of a second attack on the Louisiana statute, this time before a three-judge court, in the long litigated case of England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, 246 F.Supp. 993 (E.D.La.1965), aff’d without opinion, 384 U.S. 885, 86 S.Ct. 1924, 16 L.Ed.2d 998, rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 890, 87 S.Ct. 15, 17 L.Ed.2d 123 (1966). Plaintiffs complain that they were denied an opportunity to present, at an evidentiary hearing, facts which they claim would show that, despite thi…
• United States v. Levine, 372 F.2d 70 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …George L. Saunders, Jr., a member of the Chicago Bar, deserves our appreciation for his representation of the defendant as court-appointed counsel in this appeal. . United States v. Levine, 354 F. 2d 568 (7th Cir. 1965). . Levine v. United States, 384 U.S. 885, 86 S.Ct. 1973, 16 L.Ed.2d 1000 (1966). . The Government’s summation to the jury included references to Hart’s testimony relating to the defendant’s implication in the first robbery. These allusions by counsel were within the permissible scope of c…