NEW JERSEY ET AL.
v.
RUSSO ET AL.
NEW JERSEY ET AL.
RUSSO ET AL.
384 U.S. 889
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 16 L. Ed. 2d 995 · 86 S. Ct. 1914 · 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1140 · SCDB 1965-138
Cited by 64 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion of respondent Frank Bisignano for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgment is vacated. The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for further proceedings in light of Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, p. 719.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, at 736.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
United States v. Seale, 461 F.2d 345 (7th Cir. 1972)…uld be interposed wholly apart from the total punishment he metes out. For example, the 16 specifications in the instant case are similar to those in United States v. Schiffer, 351 F. 2d 91, 96-101 (6th Cir. 1965), certiorari denied, 384 U.S. 1003, 86 S.Ct. 1914, 16 L.Ed.2d 1017, where an attorney was cited for [*354] contemptuous misconduct during the trial. “The contempt certificate set forth under four headings divided into sixteen parts the acts, statements and conduct of Schiffer during the six and one…1 / 2
-
Hanger v. United States, 398 F.2d 91 (8th Cir. 1968)…es, 119 F. 2d 539, 546 (9 Cir.1941), cert. denied 314 U.S. 616, 62 S.Ct. 78, 86 L.Ed. 496; see, National Dairy Products Corporation v. United States, 350 F. 2d 321, 337 (8 Cir.1965), vacated and remanded on other grounds 384 U.S. 883, 86 S.Ct. 1913, 16 L.Ed.2d 995; Marbs v. United States, 250 F. 2d 514, 522 (8 Cir.1957), cert. denied, Sarkis v. United States, 356 U.S. 919, 78 S.Ct. 703, 2 L.Ed.2d 715. The same applies to the substantive offense where it was shown that the parties were acting in concert. The C…
-
In re Dellinger, 461 F.2d 389 (7th Cir. 1972)…ling is adverse, it is not counsel’s right to resist it or to insult the judge — his right is only respectfully to preserve his point for appeal.” See also United States v. Schiffer, 351 F. 2d 91, 94 (6th Cir. 1965) certiorari denied, 384 U.S. 1003, 86 S.Ct. 1914, 16 L.Ed.2d 1017; MacInnis v. United States, 191 F. 2d 157, 160 (9th Cir. 1951), certiorari denied, 342 U.S. 953, 72 S.Ct. 628, 96 L.Ed. 708; Halliman v. United States, 182 F. 2d 880, 887 (9th Cir. 1950), certiorari denied, 341 U.S. 952, 71 S.Ct. 10…
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence