BAINES ET AL.
v.
CITY OF DANVILLE
BAINES ET AL.
CITY OF DANVILLE
384 U.S. 890
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Caution
Also reported at: 16 L. Ed. 2d 996 · 86 S. Ct. 1915 · 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1141 · SCDB 1965-139
Cited by 62 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motions to dispense with printing the petition for a writ of certiorari and the respondent’s brief are granted. The petition for writ of certiorari is also granted and the judgments are affirmed. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, p. 808.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Fortas would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Douglas in City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, at 835.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (25 total)
-
United States v. Scott, 425 F.2d 55 (9th Cir. 1970)…be on the minimal side. On the record before us, where the appellant’s guilt is evident, we should exercise our discretion against the employment of Rule 52(b). Kohatsu v. United States, 351 F. 2d 898 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U. S. 1011, 86 S.Ct. 1915, 16 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1966); United States v. Lopez, 414 F. 2d 272 (2d Cir. 1969), and United States ex rel. West v. LaVallee, 335 F. 2d 230 (2d Cir. 1964), cited by the majority, are not to the contrary. Implicit in each of those cases is the well esta…1 / 2
-
Sw. Airlines Co. v. Tex. Int'l Airlines, Inc., 546 F.2d 84 (5th Cir. 1977)…parties exists and that the Anti-injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283, does not establish an independent basis of jurisdiction. Tyler v. Russell, 10 Cir. 1969, 410 F. 2d 490, 491; Baines v. City of Danville, 4 Cir. 1964, 337 F. 2d 579, 593; aff’d, 1966, 384 U.S. 890, 86 S.Ct. 1915, 16 L.Ed.2d 966, rehearing denied, 385 U.S. 890, 87 S.Ct. 12, 17 L.Ed.2d 121; Schell v. Food Machinery Corp., 5 Cir. 1937, 87 F. 2d 385, 387, cert. denied, 300 U.S. 679, 57 S.Ct. 670, 81 L.Ed. 883. The appellants also deny the existen…
-
Amsler v. United States, 381 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1967)…me subjects.” This was a reasonable restriction and was a matter within the sound discretion of the court. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 62 S.Ct. 457, 86 L.Ed. 680; Kohatsu v. United States, 9 Cir., 351 F. 2d 898, cert. den. 384 U.S. 1011, 86 S.Ct. 1915, 16 L.Ed.2d 1017; Beck v. United States, 9 Cir., 298 F. 2d 622, cert. den. 370 U.S. 919, 82 S.Ct. 1558, 8 L.Ed.2d 499. The record shows that the trial judge was liberal in allowing cross-examination by all defense counsel. There was no error in this…
Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence