ROBERT LEE JONES, PETITIONER-CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
CITY OF MIAMI BEACH ET AL., RESPONDENTS-CROSS-PETITIONER
By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date February 23, 1966.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10 subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied. The cross-petition is also denied.
Petitioner Robert Lee Jones’ petition for attorneys fees is granted in the amount of $250.00 for successfully defending against the cross-petition.
THORNALL, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Wilcox, 458 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…accident is, however, compensable, if the subsequent injury, whether an aggravation of the original injury or a new and distinct injury, is a direct and natural result of a compensable primary injury. Apgar & Markham Construction Company v. Golden, 190 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1966). Since the deputy commissioner in his order on appeal appears to apply a “reverse merger” in arriving at the finding of total disability, it must be reversed. However, in view of the evidence indicating that on the date of her second (no…
-
Turner v. G. Pierce Wood Mem'l Hosp. & State of Fla., 600 So. 2d 1153 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…not necessary for the claimant to show that the industrial accident is the sole cause of the injury or condition, but only that it is either a competent, precipitating or accelerating cause of the injury. Apgar & Markham Construction Co. v. Golden, 190 So. 2d 323, 324-25 (Fla.1966). “[The] claimant’s burden is to present evidence ‘which reasonably permits a conclusion that the compensable physical limitation was an element in the causal chain resulting in or contributing to the wage loss.’ ” STC/Documation v…
-
Reynolds v. Lines, 279 So. 2d 293 (Fla. 1973)…pain nervousness or anxiety, which would support the specialist’s conclusion and which would remove it from the area of speculation. we cannot give it the weight of substantial evidence.” Finally, in Apgar & Markham Construction Company v. Golden, 190 So. 2d 323 (Fla.1966), we again recognized the general compensability of work-related heart attacks but denied compensation under the circumstances there: “While many emotional reactions and resulting disabilities following an injury may likely be found compe…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence