WHISMAN
v.
GEORGIA
WHISMAN
GEORGIA
384 U.S. 895
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 16 L. Ed. 2d 1001 · 86 S. Ct. 1977 · SCDB 1965-141 · 1966 U.S. LEXIS 1146
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted and the judgment reversed. He would remand the case for a new trial, it being clear from the record that the principles announced in Miranda v. Arizona, ante, p. 436, were not applied. He sees no reason for discriminating against this petitioner, the case having come here on direct review and being of the same vintage as Miranda v. Arizona. See dissenting opinion in Johnson v. New Jersey, ante, at 736.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Johnson, 457 U.S. 537 (U.S. 1982)…senting); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293, 302 (1967) (Douglas, J., dissenting); id., at 303 (Black, J., dissenting); Johnson [*546] v. New Jersey, 384 U. S. 719, 736 (1966) (Black, J., with whom Douglas, J., joined, dissenting); Whisman v. Georgia, 384 U. S. 895 (1966) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Tehan v. United States ex rel. Shott, 382 U. S., at 419 (Black, J., with whom Douglas, J., joined, dissenting); Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S., at 640 (Black, J., with whom Douglas, J., joined, dissenting). Evenha…
-
Daniel v. Louisiana, 420 U.S. 31 (U.S. 1975)…onal standards of procedural due process. I have recorded my dissents in other like situations, e. g., Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293, 302-303; Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U. S. 618, 640; Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U. S. 719, 736; Whisman v. Georgia, 384 U. S. 895.* When Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, was decided we applied its ruling to three other cases in which [*34] we also granted certiorari, id., at 499. We had held 40 additional cases raising the same point; and when Miranda was decided we denied c…