SENFOUR INVESTMENT CO., INC.

v.

KING COUNTY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Robel, 389 U.S. 258 (U.S. 1967)
  …n of the statute,3 initially took its appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On the Government’s motion, the case was certified here as properly a direct appeal to this Court under 18 U. S. C. § 3731. We noted probable jurisdiction. 384 U. S. 937.4 We affirm the judgment of the District Court, but on the ground that § 5 (a) (1)(D) is an unconstitutional abridgment of the right of association protected by the First Amendment.5 [*262] We cannot agree with the District Court that § 6 (a) (1)(D)…
• Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 (U.S. 1967)
  …review of the petitioner’s conviction, the Chief Justice dissenting. 386 S. W. 2d 270. Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 41-2713 to 41-2728. 239 Ark. 474, 393 S. W. 2d 219. Redrup v. New York, 384 U. S. 916; Austin v. Kentucky, 384 U. S. 916; Gent v. Arkansas, 384 U. S. 937. In each cf the cases before us, the contention that the publications involved were basically protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments was timely but unsuccessfully asserted in the state proceedings. In each of these cases, this contention…
• Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian Nation, 439 U.S. 463 (U.S. 1979)
  …dge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 471, 475, and n. 6. Moreover, the disclaimer issue was implicit in the subjects the parties were requested to address in our order noting probable jurisdiction of this appeal. 435 U. S. 903. Cf. Cent v. [*477] Arkansas, 384 U. S. 937; Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Comm’n, 401 U. S. 933. Washington also contends that this Court’s summary dismissals in Makah Indian Tribe v. State, 76 Wash. 2d 485, 457 P. 2d 590, appeal dismissed, 397 U. S. 316; Tonasket v. State, 84 Wash. 2d 164,…