IN RE SEVERINO

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• United States v. Hyde, 448 F.2d 815 (5th Cir. 1971)
  …It was clearly the function of the Court to determine whether interstate commerce was affected and whether the Court had jurisdiction under the Act.” (Emphasis supplied). In United States v. Ricciardi, 2 Cir. 1965, 357 F. 2d 91; certiorari denied, 384 U.S. 942, 86 S.Ct. 1464, 16 L.Ed.2d 540, the Court commented on the proper allocation of duties between court and jury in determining jurisdictional questions in criminal cases brought under 29 U.S.C. § 186 as follows: “Although in both cases now before us t…
• Gurleski v. United States, 405 F.2d 253 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …the defendant is for the jury. The jury, by its verdict, has decided that this particular Frank Smith was the person identified and that decision has ample support in the evidence. Cf. Smith v. United States, 358 F. 2d 695 (5 Cir. 1966), cert. den. 384 U.S. 942, 86 S.Ct. 1463, 16 L.Ed.2d 540. Smith also asserts that there is no showing that he had knowledge that the cars were stolen, that they were to be transported in interstate commerce or that the cars ever crossed the Texas border on their way to Cali…
• United States v. Barton, 647 F.2d 224 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …the adequacy of the undisputed evidence as to the alternative jurisdictional predicates, we conclude that any error in giving the insurance portion of the charge was harmless. See United States v. Ricciardi, 357 F. 2d 91, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 942, 86 S.Ct. 1464, 16 L.Ed.2d 540 (1966). C. Evidence with Respect to Interstate Commerce Under § 1962 Appellants make a similar challenge to the jurisdictional predicate for the RICO charge, Count Thirteen. That count charged appellants other than B…

  ← 1 / 2 →