ARMSTRONG

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Booker v. State OF Ark., 380 F.2d 240 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …state criminal judgment. Waldon v. State of Iowa, 323 F. 2d 852 (8 Cir. 1963); Christopher [*243] v. State of Iowa, 324 F. 2d 180 (8 Cir. 1963); United States ex rel. Bennett v. People of State of Illinois, 356 F. 2d 878 (7 Cir. 1966), cert. denied 384 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 1472, 16 L.Ed.2d 544. See Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 431, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963); Gajewski v. United States, 368 F. 2d 533, 534 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied 386 U.S. 913, 87 S.Ct. 865, 17 L.Ed.2d 786; Coronado v. United States,…
• United States v. Edwards, 443 F.2d 1286 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …o more.” Accord, United States v. Francisco, 410 F. 2d 1283, 1286 (8th Cir. 1969). But see United States v. Jones, 418 F. 2d 818, 826, 829 (8th Cir. 1969) (2-1 decision). . Masters v. United States, 351 F. 2d 105, 106 (8th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 1474, 16 L.Ed.2d 544 (1966); Neubauer v. United States, 250 F. 2d 838, 839-840 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 356 U.S. 927, 78 S.Ct. 715, 2 L.Ed. 2d 758 (1958). See also United States v. Whitney, supra, 425 F. 2d at 171; United States v. Wilson…
• Freida Seiden v. United States, 537 F.2d 867 (6th Cir. 1976)
  …available remedy while mandamus is not. The jurisdiction of a District Court in mandamus is ordinarily limited to nondiscretionary ministerial duties. Armstrong v. United States, 233 F.Supp. 188, aff’d, 354 F. 2d 648 (9th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 1472, 16 L.Ed.2d 543 (1966); Switzerland Co. v. Udall, D.C.N.C., 225 F.Supp. 812, aff’d, 337 F. 2d 56 (4th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 914, 85 S.Ct. 900, 13 L.Ed.2d 800 (1965). In another context it has been held that mandamus will…