BENNETT
v.
FORD MOTOR CO.

U.S. | 1966-05-23
No. 1184
384 U.S. 949 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • McCRAY v. Illinois, 386 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1967)
    …ial privilege, including the privilege against compulsory self-incrimination guaranteed by the Constitution itself.. We. have never given the Sixth Amendment such a construction, and we decline to do so now. Affirmed. 33 Ill. 2d, 210 N. E. 2d 161 384 U.S. 949. The weather was “real cold,” and the petitioner testified he “had on three coats.” In order to conduct the search, the arresting officers required the petitioner to remove some of his clothing, but even the petitioner’s version of the circumstance…
  • Dep't of Emp. v. United States, 385 U.S. 355 (U.S. 1966)
    …t to 28 U. S. C. § 1253,3 the Department of Employment and its executive director sought direct review here. In setting the case for argument, we postponed consideration of questions pertaining to our jurisdiction and that of the three-judge court. 384 U. S. 949 (1966). We are persuaded that there exist no jurisdictional barriers to our disposition of this appeal on the merits. Any challenge to the applicability of the three-judge court provision, 28 U. S. C. § 2281, is foreclosed by this Court’s decision…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw