ABBORENO ET AL.

v.

AUSTIN, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Davis, 666 F.2d 195 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …e of the evidence that the crime was committed in the trial district, both territorial jurisdiction and proper venue are established. United States v. Luton, 486 F. 2d at 1022-23; Cauley v. United States, 355 F. 2d 175, 176 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 951, 86 S.Ct. 1572, 16 L.Ed.2d 548 (1966). The question for this court, then, is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and making all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury verdict, Unite…
• Spinelli v. United States, 382 F.2d 871 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …290, 296 (Mo.1954). While appellant admits that evidence of criminal acts other than the one charged may be introduced to show intent or other element of the charged offense (See, United States v. Compton, 355 F. 2d 872 (6 Cir. 1966), cert. denied 384 U.S. 951, 86 S.Ct. 1571, 16 L.Ed.2d 548) he contends that evidence of gambling which took place at a different location in St. Louis some seven months earlier is too remote to be admissible. We disagree. Two important elements of the charged crime are trave…
• Perkins State Bank v. Connolly, 632 F.2d 1306 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …st decide issues of state law even in the complete absence of relevant state statutes and cases. E. g., Nobs Chemical, U.S.A., Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc., 616 F. 2d 212 (5th Cir. 1980); Kellerman v. Miller, 354 F. 2d 46 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 951, 86 S.Ct. 1571, 16 L.Ed.2d 548 (1966); Santiesteban v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 306 F. 2d 9 (5th Cir. 1962). But this is not a case where we are being asked to decide a new issue of state law in the absence of state guidance. We are being asked…