COMPTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. White, 611 F.2d 531 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …e of the evidence that the crime was committed in the trial district, both territorial jurisdiction and proper venue are established. United States v. Luton, 486 F. 2d at 1022-23; Cauley v. United States, 355 F. 2d 175, 176 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 951, 86 S.Ct. 1572, 16 L.Ed.2d 548 (1966). The question for this court, then, is whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government and making all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jury verdict, Uni…
• United States v. Gooding, 473 F.2d 425 (5th Cir. 1973)
  …e outside the ambit of the Travel Act, will not preclude conviction under the Act if the requisite § 1952(a) intent is also present. Compare United States v. Hawthorne, supra, with United States v. Compton, 6th Cir. 1966, 355 F. 2d 872, cert. denied 384 U.S. 951, 86 S.Ct. 1571, 16 L.Ed.2d 548. It is well established that intent, an element of the offense, may be inferred from objective facts, such as defendant’s conduct immediately before and after travel. United States v. Salsbury, 4th Cir. 1970, 430 F. 2d…
• United States v. Herrera, 584 F.2d 1137 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …was undertaken with the intent to carry on the unlawful activity. United States v. Sapperstein, 312 F. 2d 964 (4th Cir. 1963); United States v. Farber, 336 F. 2d 586 (6th Cir. 1964); United States v. Compton, 355 F. 2d 872 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 951, 86 S.Ct. 1571, 16 L.Ed.2d 548 (1966); United States v. Harris, 275 F.Supp. 161 (D.C.Va.1967), affirmed 399 F. 2d 687 (4th Cir. 1968). The case at hand shows a knowing and intentional use of interstate commerce by members of the conspiracy, which c…