IN RE PIVER

Citator

Cited By (24 total)

• Morton Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin & DeCoppet & Doremus, 391 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …ustrated. In essence, the spurious class action was interpreted as merely a permissive joinder device.2 Sea Carroll v. American Federation of Musicians, 372 F. 2d 155 (2d Cir. 1967); Fox v. Glickman Corp., 355 F. 2d 161 (2d. Cir. 1965), cert. denied 384 U.S. 960, 86 S.Ct. 1585, 16 L.Ed.2d 672 (1966); Nagler v. Admiral Corp., 248 F. 2d 319 (2d Cir. 1957); Oppenheimer v. F. J. Young & Co., 144 F. 2d 387 (2d Cir. 1944). But see Weeks v. Bareco Oil Co., 125 F. 2d 84 (7th Cir. 1941) (dictum). To avoid the prob…
• Delancey v. Motichek Towing Serv., Inc., 427 F.2d 897 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …R. R. v. Gunter, 5 Cir. 1956, 229 F. 2d 842. A general objection presents nothing for review. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v. Hutchins, 5 Cir. 1951, 188 F. 2d 214. See Charles A. Wright, Inc. v. F. D. Rich Co., 1 Cir. 1966, 354 F. 2d 710, cert. denied, 384 U.S. 960, 86 S.Ct. 1586, 16 L.Ed.2d 673. In Lumbermens the defendant objected specifically to the district court’s submitting charges 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 14 of the plaintiff’s Special Requested Charges. On appeal, notwithstanding the reference to numb…
• United States v. Radetsky, 535 F.2d 556 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …y, a master’s report involving an accounting report and damage findings may be treated as an item of evidence entitled to such weight as the jury may accord it. Charles A. Wright, Inc. v. F. D. Rich Co., 354 F. 2d 710 (1st Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 960, 86 S.Ct. 1586, 16 L.Ed.2d 673 (1966). II. I respectfully dissent from the reversal of Radetsky’s conviction on 26 of the counts. The criteria adopted by CMS for payment and/or non-payment of the specific drugs in issue does not, as the majority o…