WOMACK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (22 total)

• Bradley v. Sch. Bd. of the City of Richmond, 416 U.S. 696 (U.S. 1974)
  …ourts, in the absence of any attendant constitutional problem, generally have followed that lead. See, for example, Goldstein v. California, 412 U. S. 546, 551-552 (1973); United States v. Thompson, 356 F. 2d 216, 227 n. 12 (CA2 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 964 (1966). In Johnson v. Combs, the Fifth Circuit characterized the legislative history of § 718 as “inconclusive,” ‘ 471 F. 2d, at 87. In Thompson v. School Board of the City of Newport News, the Fourth Circuit'rejected the view that the legislative…
• United States v. Springer, 460 F.2d 1344 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …Ct. 625, 21 L.Ed.2d 564 [*1349] (1969) (a case considering this issue in the setting of the voluntariness of a consent to search, the fourth amendment equivalent issue), and United States v. Thompson, 356 F. 2d 216, 220 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 964, 86 S.Ct. 1591, 16 L.Ed.2d 675 (1966) (also a search case where the court emphasized the importance of the district judge’s “judgment of the credibility of the witnesses”). Other courts have reached the same conclusion that the reading of the form…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Gorman v. United States, 380 F.2d 158 (1st Cir. 1967)
  …ould be found, we need not assume that he would have thought them significant. . In fact, the testimony suggests that the-request to search was made at least twice. Cf. United States v. Thompson, 356 F. 2d 216, 219-221 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 964, 86 S.Ct. 1591, 16 L.Ed. 2d 675 (1966), where the defendant (before arrest) had three opportunities to object to entrance and search. In that case, as here, there was no “evidence of exhaustive questioning, persistent demands or coercive action on t…