HILL
v.
SPERRY RAND CORP.
HILL
SPERRY RAND CORP.
384 U.S. 973
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Caution
Cited by 38 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (19 total)
-
Silverthorne v. United States, 400 F.2d 627 (9th Cir. 1968)…te. The denial of this motion was in the sound discretion of the trial court and a denial of such a motion, prior to the voir dire examination, is not an abuse of that discretion. United States v. Medlin, 353 F. 2d 789 (6th Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 973, 86 S.Ct. 1860, 16 L.Ed.2d 683, reh. denied, 385 U.S. 889, 87 S.Ct. 14, 17 L.Ed.2d 123 (1966). In contemplating the effect of the publicity on the public, we note that on September 9, 1965, the day the federal indictments were returned against Silv…
-
Patriarca v. United States, 402 F.2d 314 (1st Cir. 1968)…use, Such authorities as Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339, 359-360 n. 15, 78 S.Ct. 311, 2 L.Ed.2d 321 (1958); Gradsky v. United States, 373 F. 2d 706, 710 (5th Cir. 1967); United States v. Medlin, 353 F. 2d 789, 795 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 973, 86 S.Ct. 1860, 16 L.Ed.2d 683 (1966); Jones v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 213, 338 F. 2d 553, 554, n. 3 (1964); and United States v. Battiato, 204 F. 2d 717 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 346 U.S. 871, 74 S.Ct. 118, 98 L.Ed. 380 (1953) seem to defi…
-
United States v. Conder, 423 F.2d 904 (6th Cir. 1970)…r these circumstances the District Court committed no error in denying the motions for a continuance or a mistrial. See United States v. Acuff, 410 F. 2d 463, 465 (6th Cir. 1969); United States v. Medlin, 353 F. 2d 789, 792 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 973, 86 S.Ct. 1860, 16 L.Ed.2d 683 (1965); United States v. Hoffa, 349 F. 2d 20, 39 (6th Cir. 1965), aff'd. 385 U.S. 293, 87 S.Ct. 408, 17 L.Ed.2d 374 (1966). Affirmed.…
Previewing 3 of 19 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence