MCCOMBS

v.

COX, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• Mitchell v. King, 537 F.2d 385 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …states will be followed by the federal courts unless those interpretations are inconsistent with fundamental principles of liberty and justice. O’Brien v. Skinner, supra; Pearce v. Cox, 354 F. 2d 884 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, Charlton v. Cox, 384 U.S. 976, 86 S.Ct. 1869, 16 L.Ed.2d 685 (1966); Goldsmith v. Cheney, 447 F. 2d 624 (10th Cir. 1971). For decisions from other state jurisdictions which have upheld the governor’s power of removal of a state appointee serving for a fixed term, without notice…
• Goldsmith v. Cheney, 447 F.2d 624 (10th Cir. 1971)
  …ouse, 422 F. 2d 852, 853 (10th Cir. 1970); Chavez v. Baker, 399 F. 2d 943 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 950, 89 S.Ct. 1289, 22 L.Ed.2d 485 (1969); Pearce v. Cox, 354 F. 2d 884, 891 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied sub nom., Charlton v. Cox, 384 U.S. 976, 86 S.Ct. 1869, 16 L.Ed.2d 685 (1966). The statutory construction given the statute by the Supreme Court of Wyoming does not offend the fundamental principles of liberty and justice and appears to be a reasonable construction. Generally, to sustain…
• Ramirez v. State OF Ariz., 437 F.2d 119 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …liminary hearing upon the charge of grand theft. The Federal Constitution does not secure to a state court defendant a right to a preliminary hearing. (Pearce v. Cox (10th Cir. 1965) 354 F. 2d 884, cert. denied sub nom. Charlton v. Cox [*120] (1966) 384 U.S. 976, 86 S.Ct. 1869, 16 L.Ed.2d 685.) Moreover, under Arizona law, the filing of an information charging an offense different from that to which a defendant had been held to answer is not a jurisdictional defect, and the error is waived if timely objecti…