AMES

v.

MYERS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. Honorable Richard D. Rogers, 917 F.2d 1283 (10th Cir. 1990)
  …ordinary rules of civil procedure are not intended to apply thereto, at least in the initial, emergency attention given as prescribed by statute to the application of the writ. Ruby v. United States, 341 F. 2d 585, 587 (9th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1877, 16 L.Ed.2d 689 (1966). See also Van Buskirk v. Wilkinson, 216 F. 2d 735, 737-38 (9th Cir.1954) (habeas corpus “is a speedy remedy, entitled by statute to special, preferential consideration to insure expeditious hearing and determina…
• Monroe v. United States, 435 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1970)
  …n filing pro se § 2255 petitions. In the first pro se petition he contested the admission at trial of his testimony at the suppression hearing. The motion was denied, and we affirmed. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 359 F. 2d 380, cert. denied 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1876, 16 L.Ed.2d 689 (1966). Monroe’s second pro se petition alleged the same defect, and was denied by the district court as successive. We affirmed at 389 F. 2d 1005, on March 5, 1968. Three days later, on March 8, 1968, the Supreme Co…
• Monroe v. United States, 389 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …d the contention of this appellant and held it to lack merit. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F. 2d 277, certiorari denied 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478; Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 359 F. 2d 380, certiorari denied 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1876, 16 L.Ed.2d 689. For the reasons which we stated in those cases, the judgment is Affirmed.…