COPESTICK
v.
RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
COPESTICK
RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT
384 U.S. 978
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Monroe v. United States, 435 F.2d 160 (5th Cir. 1970)…n filing pro se § 2255 petitions. In the first pro se petition he contested the admission at trial of his testimony at the suppression hearing. The motion was denied, and we affirmed. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 359 F. 2d 380, cert. denied 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1876, 16 L.Ed.2d 689 (1966). Monroe’s second pro se petition alleged the same defect, and was denied by the district court as successive. We affirmed at 389 F. 2d 1005, on March 5, 1968. Three days later, on March 8, 1968, the Supreme Co…
-
Monroe v. United States, 389 F.2d 1005 (5th Cir. 1968)…d the contention of this appellant and held it to lack merit. Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1963, 320 F. 2d 277, certiorari denied 375 U.S. 991, 84 S.Ct. 630, 11 L.Ed.2d 478; Monroe v. United States, 5 Cir., 1966, 359 F. 2d 380, certiorari denied 384 U.S. 978, 86 S.Ct. 1876, 16 L.Ed.2d 689. For the reasons which we stated in those cases, the judgment is Affirmed.…