ZIZZO ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …all defendants remained silent. An error not raised in the trial court may not be raised for the first time on appeal. United States v. DiFronzo, 7 Cir., 345 F. 2d 383 (1965), cert. den., 382. U.S. 829, 86 S.Ct. 67, 15 L.Ed.2d 74 (1965), reh. den., 384 U.S. 982, 86 S.Ct. 1856, 16 L.Ed.2d 693 (1966); Holmes v. United States, 7 Cir., 323 F. 2d 430 (1963), cert. den., 376 U.S. 933, 84 S.Ct. 704, 11 L.Ed.2d 652 (1964); United States v. Sferas, 7 Cir., 210 F. 2d 69 (1954). [*206] Defendants’ general objections…
• Ohio v. Kentucky, 410 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1973)
  …water mark which is located to the south of the present north shore line.” Ohio “does now and has always claimed . . . that the boundary between it and Kentucky is the 1792 northerly low water mark.” Leave to file the bill of complaint was granted. 384 U. S. 982 (1966). Kentucky by its answer admitted the allegations of the above-quoted numbered paragraphs of Ohio’s complaint. The Court then appointed the Honorable Phillip Forman as Special Master in the case. 385 U. S. 803 (1966). Five years later, in Aug…
• United States v. Perlman, 430 F.2d 22 (7th Cir. 1970)
  …ffense by Dalton which accomplished the goal of the conspiracy rendered Perlman guilty of the same offense. United States v. Zizzo, 338 F. 2d 577, 580 (7th Cir. 1964), certiorari denied, 381 U.S. 915, 85 S.Ct. 1530, 14 L.Ed.2d 435, rehearing denied, 384 U.S. 982, 86 S.Ct. 1856, 16 L.Ed.2d 693; United States v. Chambers, 382 F. 2d 910, 914 (6th Cir. 1967); United States [*25] v. Ward, 360 F. 2d 909, 910 (7th Cir. 1966). We therefore hold that jurisdiction was proper for the prosecution under Section 4742(a)…