MELFA

v.

DAVIS, COMMISSIONER OF PERSONNEL OF MARYLAND, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• Hyman Martin v. State, 208 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
  …ie v. State, Fla.App.1960, 120 So. 2d 27; Martin v. State, Fla.App.1967, 194 So. 2d 8; Harris v. United States, 1965, 382 U.S. 162, 86 S.Ct. 352, 15 L.Ed.2d 240; Koota v. Colombo, 1966, 17 N.Y.2d 147, 269 N.Y.S.2d 393, 216 N.E. 2d 568 (cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1001, 86 S.Ct. 1923, 16 L.Ed.2d 1015). Some of the cases, especially those in the federal courts, are controlled by special rules of procedure. Such a rule became effective in Florida December 31, 1967. See 33 F.S.A. Section 1.840, F.R.Cr.P. In Clien v.…
• United States v. Colasurdo, 453 F.2d 585 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …re each sentenced to one year’s imprisonment on Count One but McLaney’s sentence was suspended. . As such it was properly admitted and the motion to strike it was properly denied. United States v. Abrams, 357 F. 2d 539, 546 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1001, 86 S.Ct. 1922, 16 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1966); United States v. Guterma, 281 F. 2d 742, 746 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 871, 81 S.Ct. 114, 5 L.Ed.2d 93 (1960). . Appellants claim the court was referring solely to the mail fraud counts (2-21). But si…
• United States v. Wolfson, 405 F.2d 779 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …not well grounded. The prosecution did no more than argue fraud as a motive for the appellants’ failure to register. On this issue evidence of fraudulent activities is relevant. United States v. Abrams, 357 F. 2d 539, 546 (C.A.2, 1966), cert. denied 384 U.S. 1001, 86 S.Ct. 1922, 16 L.Ed.2d 1014 (1966). The court below in suggesting that the Abrams case was not in point was speaking in another context. Without going into greater detail it will suffice to say that reading the prosecuting attorney’s entire su…