CALIFORNIA

v.

CURRY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Harrison v. United States, 387 F.2d 203 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …and Bowden and its progeny are inapplicable since they involved witnesses who were not defendants and thus there was no question of testimonial compulsion. . Compare People v. Polk, 63 Cal.2d 443, 47 Cal.Rptr. 1, 406 P. 2d 641 (1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1010, 86 S.Ct. 1914, 16 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1966) (Traynor, C. J.).…
• Miller v. California, 392 U.S. 616 (U.S. 1968)
  …r was filed on October 13, and Fisk remained in petitioner’s cell, eliciting information or conversing with petitioner until October 15.9 Both state courts, see, e. g., People v. Flores, 236 Cal. App. 2d 807, 46 Cal. Rptr. 412 (1965), cert. denied, 384 U. S. 1010 (1966) (jail cell plant); People v. Ludlum, 236 Cal. App. 2d 813, 46 Cal. Rptr. 375 (1965), and lower federal courts, see, e. g., Clifton v. United States, 341 F. 2d 649 (C. A. 5th Cir. 1965), have held that the right to counsel as interpreted in Ma…