SULLINS

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564 (U.S. 1976)
  …osecutor decided to indict); United States v. Nickels, 502 F. 2d 1173, 1176 (CA7 1974), cert. pending, No. 74-735 (by implication Miranda warning required for “potential defendant”); Kitchell v. United States, 354 F. 2d 715, 720 (CA1), cert. denied, 384 U. S. 1011 (1966) (by implication warning required for person “clearly suspected”); United States v. De Sapio, 299 F. Supp. 436, 440 (SDNY 1969) (by implication warning required for “target” defendant). It is certainly no response to argue that a de facto def…
• United States v. Somers, 496 F.2d 723 (3d Cir. 1974)
  …suggestion is clearly improper. United States v. Scalia, 464 F. 2d 1301, 1303 (3d Cir. 1972) (per curiam), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 933, 93 S.Ct. 1384, 35 L.Ed.2d 596 (1973); Kitchell v. United States, 354 F. 2d 715, 719 (1st Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1011, 86 S.Ct. 1970, 16 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1966); McMillian v. United States, 363 F. 2d 165, 169 (5th Cir. 1966); United States v. Lefkowitz, 284 F. 2d 310, 314 (2d Cir. 1960). Ponzio suggests that United States v. Schartner, 426 F. 2d 470 (3d Cir. 1970), re…
• United States v. Flannery, 451 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1971)
  …25 L.Ed.2d 86; Holden v. United States, 1 Cir., 1968, 393 F. 2d 276; Holden v. United States, 1 Cir., 1968, 388 F. 2d 240, cert. denied 393 U.S. 864, 89 S.Ct. 146, 21 L.Ed.2d 132; Kitchell v. United States, 1 Cir., 1966, 354 F. 2d 715, cert. denied 384 U.S. 1011, 86 S.Ct. 1970, 16 L.Ed.2d 1032. . See, e. g., United States v. Thomas, ante at n. 45.…