JIM H. CARTER, APPELLANT,

v.

POMPANO BEACH ABSTRACT COMPANY ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Youngker v. State, 215 So. 2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)
  …made a false representation of his then present intention. A fraudulent or false representation or pretense within the meaning of F.S.1963, Section 811.021, F.S.A., is a false representation of a past or existing fact. Green v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 614, 616. A promise to do something in the future, even though it be a false promise, is not a representation of a past or existing fact and will not support a conviction for false pretenses. Such was the holding of the Florida Supreme Court in Scarlett…
• Glassman v. State, 377 So. 2d 208 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …King, 282 So. 2d 162 (Fla.1973); Sanders v. State, 73 So. 2d 292 (Fla.1954); Francis v. State, 343 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); White v. State, 324 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Maycock v. State, 284 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Green v. State, 190 So. 2d 614 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Casso v. State, 182 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966); § 775.011(2), Fla.Stat. (1975); § 932.465(2), Fla.Stat. (1973). The convictions and sentences under review are reversed and the cause is remanded to the trial court with directio…
• Dirk, 305 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 1974)
  …funds on deposit in or credit with the drawee, and (5) intent to defraud. With respect to intent to defraud as an indispensable element of the crime, see United States v. Frazier, 444 F. 2d 235 (5th Cir. 1971) (quoting Green v. State, Fla.App.1966, 190 So. 2d 614, 616), and Ennis v. State, Fla.1957, 95 So. 2d 20. But as to proof of the foregoing elements, we held in Shargaa v. State, Fla.1955, 84 So. 2d 42, that the statute makes introduction into evidence of a check marked insufficient funds alone sufficien…

Authorities Cited

• Ross v. Gore, 48 So. 2d 412 (Fla. 1950)
• Lincoln Hulley v. Hunt, 63 Fla. 179 (Fla. 1912)