NEUENFELDT

v.

WISCONSIN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Parker, 469 F.2d 884 (10th Cir. 1972)
  …y such evidence must “have a real probative value, and not just a possible worth on issues of intent, motive, absence of mistake or accident, or to establish a scheme or plan.” Morgan v. United States, 355 F. 2d 43, 45 (10th Cir. 1966), cert. denied 384 U.S. 1025, 86 S. Ct. 1976, 16 L.Ed.2d 1029 (1966). [Emphasis added.] If the defendants hired or caused the two felons to make the forbidden bombs and molotov cocktails — (as the jury found by its verdict) — evidence of their having caused other forbidden des…
• United States v. DYE Constr. Co., 510 F.2d 78 (10th Cir. 1975)
  …2); Holt v. United States, 404 F. 2d 914 (10th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1086, 92 S.Ct. 292, 30 L.Ed.2d 257 (1968); Rothering v. United States, 384 F. 2d 385 (10th Cir. 1967); Morgan v. United States, 355 F. 2d 43 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 1025, 86 S.Ct. 1976, 16 L.Ed.2d 1029 (1966); Tandberg-Hanssen v. United States, 284 F. 2d 331 (10th Cir. 1960). From a reading of these cases we believe that the trial court ruled correctly; that a ruling that the evidence was relevant was correct. The…
• United States v. Carter, 433 F.2d 874 (10th Cir. 1970)
  …checks. Evidence of other crimes is admissible to show intent, absence of mistake or accident, or to establish a scheme or plan. King v. United States, 10 Cir., 402 F. 2d 289, 291, and Morgan v. United States, 10 Cir., 355 F. 2d 43, 45, cert. denied 384 U.S. 1025, 86 S.Ct. 1976, 16 L.Ed.2d 1029. Here the evidence tended to es tablish a common scheme or design and was so related to the offenses charged as to establish intent and absence of mistake or accident. At the time the evidence was received and again i…