REYNOLDS, DBA LARRY & KATZ, ET AL.
v.
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL

U.S. | 1966-10-10
No. 229
385 U.S. 8 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. State OF Cal., 655 F.2d 914 (9th Cir. 1980)
    …v. Reddin, 418 F. 2d 702, 704 (9th Cir. 1969); Ridley v. City of San Francisco, 272 Cal.App.2d 290, 77 Cal.Rptr. 199 (1st Dist. 1969); Tietz v. Los Angeles Unified School District, 238 Cal.App.2d 905, 48 Cal.Rptr. 245 (2d Dist. 1965), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 8, 87 S.Ct. 53, 17 L.Ed.2d 7 (1966). Consequently, the California claim filing statutes are not inapplicable to the federal government on the ground that they are merely statutes of limitation. B. The government next contends that California’s clai…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw