GUY
v.
TAHASH, WARDEN, ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-10-10
No. 169
385 U.S. 12 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ginsberg v. New York, 390 U.S. 629 (U.S. 1968)
    …he same challenge to state power to enact such a law was also addressed to § 484r-h. Bookcase, Inc. v. Broderick, 18 N. Y. 2d 71, 218 N. E. 2d 668, appeal dismissed for want of a properly presented federal question, sub nom. Bookcase, Inc. v. Leary, 385 U. S. 12. In sustaining state power to enact the law, the Court of Appeals said, Bookcase, Inc. v. Broderick, at 75, 218 N. E. 2d, at 671: “[M]aterial which is protected for distribution to adults is not necessarily constitutionally protected from restricti…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw