BRADFORD
v.
GAVAGAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
BRADFORD
GAVAGAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
385 U.S. 22
Supreme Court of the United States (1966)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Salt River Project Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 391 F.2d 470 (D.C. Cir. 1968)…er of the Supreme Court of Colorado to the contrary notwithstanding.” (Emphasis added.) The Colorado Supreme Court, in Western Colorado Power Co. v. Public Utilities Com’n of Colorado, 159 Colo. 262, 411 P. 2d 785, appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 385 U.S. 22, 87 S.Ct. 230, 17 L.Ed. 2d 21 (1966), had ordered cancellation of a certificate of convenience and necessity previously issued by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission in 1963 giving Colorado-Ute authority to operate a 150,000-kilowatt normal cap…