CARR

v.

CITY OF ALTUS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lake Carriers' Assn v. MacMULLAN, 406 U.S. 498 (U.S. 1972)
  …is circumstance, compliance is coerced by the threat of enforcement, and the controversy is both immediate and real. See, e. g., Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U. S. 510 (1925); City of Altus, Oklahoma v. Carr, 255 F. Supp. 828, aff’d per curiam, 385 U. S. 35 (1966). See generally, e. g., Comment, 62 Col. L. Rev. 106 (1962).12 [*509] Appellants next argue that the District Court erred in abstaining from deciding the merits of their complaint.13 We agree that abstention was hot proper on the majority of…
• Sporhase v. Nebraska Ex rel. Douglas, 458 U.S. 941 (U.S. 1982)
  …Geer v. Connecticut, 161 U. S. 519 [(1896)].” Ibid. While appellee relies upon Hudson County, appellants rest on our summary affirmance of a three-judge District Court judgment in City of Altus v. Carr, 255 F. Supp. 828 (WD Tex.), summarily aff’d, 385 U. S. 35 (1966). The city of Altus is located near the southern border of Oklahoma. Large population increases rendered inadequate its source of municipal water. It consequently obtained from the owners of land in an adjoining Texas county the contractual ri…

  ← 1 / 2 →