AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1966-11-07
No. 496
385 U.S. 38 Supreme Court of the United States (1966) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …Overnite Transportation Co. — Purchase —Rutherford Freight Lines, Inc., 97 M.C.C. 568 (1964), sustained sub nom. American Buslines, Inc. v. United States, 253 F.Supp. 481 (D.D.C.), aff’d, sub nom. Amalgamated Transit Union AFL-CIO v. United States, 385 U.S. 38, 87 S.Ot. 240, 17 L.Ed.2d 35 (1966) (per curiam.) . Chauffeurs, Teamsters, and Helpers Local Union No. 171, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen, and Helpers of America. . At the hearing before the T…
  • Zinger v. Blanchette, 549 F.2d 901 (3d Cir. 1977)
    …ecutive personnel. Absent evidence of the effect of this transaction upon such personnel and of their need for protection, e. g., the transferability of their skills, Amalgamated Transit Union v. United States, [D.C.] 253 F.Supp. 481, aff’d per cur. 385 U.S. 38 [87 S.Ct. 240, 17 L.Ed.2d 35] (1966), we would not be justified in providing protective conditions for these personnel.” 330 ICC at 825, 826. Though not relevant to a decision on the legal issues, we learned at oral argument that Mr. Zinger was emp…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw