SCHIPANI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Berger v. New York, 388 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1967)
  …o advised by the Solicitor General of the United States that the Federal Government has abandoned the use of electronic eavesdropping for “prose-cutorial purposes.” See Supplemental Memorandum, Schipani v. United States, No. 504, October Term, 1966, 385 U. S. 372. See also Black v. United States, 385 U. S. 26 (1966); O’Brien v. United States, 386 U. S. 345 (1967); Hoffa v. United States, 387 U. S. 231 (1967); Markis v. United States, 387 U. S. 425; Moretti v. United States, 387 U. S. 425. Despite these actio…
• O'Brien v. United States, 386 U.S. 345 (U.S. 1967)
  …General’s acknowledgment that electronic eavesdropping or wiretapping did in fact take place, I would remand the case to the District Court for a full hearing as to the circumstances and effects of these activities. * In Schipani v. United States, 385 U. S. 372, the Court properly vacated the conviction because the Solicitor General conceded that evidence used at trial was tainted.…
• United States v. Schipani, 435 F.2d 26 (2d Cir. 1970)
  …ment. Appellant’s first conviction was vacated and the case remanded to the district court for a new trial on the ground that certain evidence introduced by the Government might have been acquired by unlawful wiretapping, Schipani v. United States, 385 U.S. 372, 87 S.Ct. 533, 17 L.Ed.2d 428 (1966). On the second trial, the questioned evidence was excluded but appellant was again convicted. His conviction was affirmed by this court, United States v. Schipani, 414 F. 2d 1262 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397…